Post by account_disabled on Jan 18, 2024 0:44:41 GMT -8
Against this situation, the alleged owner of the animal sued CIPAR and the legal representative of the Center. The Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 5 of Arganda del Rey upheld the claim and ruled that CIPAR's refusal “caused enormous psychological suffering to the plaintiff, who, a lover of her animals, has seen how she has been deprived of her beloved "cat having organized her life around her other animals of her property, caring for them, pampering them and basing their company on her most intimate and familiar lifestyle," the ruling states.
Said sentence bases the conviction of the accused on the statement of the compla Whatsapp Number List inant supported by the testimony of a friend and neighbor, as well as the documentary evidence provided consisting of a health record of the animal , the complainant maintaining that she had had the cat for seven years. .
The Magistrate-Judge of the Court of First Instance sentenced the legal representative as the author of a minor crime of misappropriation to a fine of 1,440 euros . The Center was sentenced to a fine of 26,400 euros and to hand over the cat to the plaintiff. Likewise, both the Center and its representative were sentenced to compensate the woman with 2,500 euros in civil liability and, in addition, to pay jointly and severally the procedural costs.
The convicted party filed an appeal against said sentence so that it could be revoked and another one that would be acquittal be issued in its place. Subsidiarily so that a sentence proportional to the facts and the economic capacity of those accused was sentenced.
Said sentence bases the conviction of the accused on the statement of the compla Whatsapp Number List inant supported by the testimony of a friend and neighbor, as well as the documentary evidence provided consisting of a health record of the animal , the complainant maintaining that she had had the cat for seven years. .
The Magistrate-Judge of the Court of First Instance sentenced the legal representative as the author of a minor crime of misappropriation to a fine of 1,440 euros . The Center was sentenced to a fine of 26,400 euros and to hand over the cat to the plaintiff. Likewise, both the Center and its representative were sentenced to compensate the woman with 2,500 euros in civil liability and, in addition, to pay jointly and severally the procedural costs.
The convicted party filed an appeal against said sentence so that it could be revoked and another one that would be acquittal be issued in its place. Subsidiarily so that a sentence proportional to the facts and the economic capacity of those accused was sentenced.